Fringe Party Profiles: The Pirate Party

The world's first Pirate Party was founded in Sweden just a few years ago. They wanted to loosen copyright laws, make peer-to-peer file sharing legal, abolish the patent system and strengthen privacy protections. They got off to a remarkably quick start, in part thanks to their ties to the ridiculously popular Pirate Bay torrent site, which was raided by Swedish authorities within months of the party's founding. The site's co-founders and backers were put on trial for copyright infringement and within hours of the guilty verdict, party membership had surged to become one of the largest in Sweden. When it came time for the country to elect representatives for the European parliament in 2009, the Pirates won two seats.

In the meantime, other Pirate Parties had sprung up across Europe. And that summer, the Canadian Pirate Party became the very first — and to this point only — to be officially registered outside of Europe. The Canadian party also believes in the kind of copyright and privacy reforms as their Swedish counterparts. And their website argues for net neutrality — preventing Internet service providers like Bell and Rogers from purposefully slowing down the kinds of web traffic they don't like, as they do now. The party also highlights their belief in open access to government information — for instance, making all publicly funded research available to everyone. On most other issues, they maintain an officially neutral stance.

This will be the Canadian party's very first federal election. They're running ten candidates. Their first experience at the polls came in a by-election in Winnipeg last year. Their candidate finished 5th of the 7 parties who ran, behind the Greens, but ahead of the Communist Party and the Christian Heritage Party. They got 94 votes. That's 0.6% of the ballots cast in the riding.

We spoke with Jake Daynes, a founding member of the Canadian Pirate Party who was also its first interim leader, about their views and the current campaign.


How would you describe your party to a voter who isn't already familiar with it?

We're a party involved with helping promote direct democracy where MPs take the voice of their constituent to government — not the voice of their party whip.

What kind of voter do you expect your party to appeal to?

We feel that our party appeals to all different voters — from students to grandparents. Who wants the government reading an email they send to their grandchildren? Due to our Block-Neutral stance we have attracted Cons/Libs/Greens/Marxists and many more people from all walks of life.

What policies, if any, does your party support beyond net neutrality, copyright and other web issues?

Outside of our core platform, candidates are mandated with forming a comprehensive platform around the needs of their constituents. We have no party whip and advocate proper, direct, democracy.

What do you see as the biggest flaw in the way the country has been run over the last few years?

The lack of transparency and the catering to corporate interests over Canadian's interests.

What's your response to people who suggest that voting for a lesser-known political party is tantamount to throwing your vote away?

If voting for lesser-known party's is throwing your vote away, then how did the big parties get big? They didn't appear out of nowhere, everybody has to start somewhere — and when has a change in our 2.5 party system been more needed than now?

What has to have happened by the time the election is over for you to look back on it as a success?

I think that so far we've already been able to count this election as a success — we've managed to field 10 candidates in our first general election. We've helped get Canadians talking about our issues with the help of OpenMedia, and so far, we've had good reviews from constituents in almost all of the ridings we are running in.

What are your long-term hopes for your party? Where would you like to see it in five or ten years?

I personally, as a founding member, want to see it in parliament, with at least 1 MP. We've grown faster than any other party in Canada — at 2300 members since mid-late 2009 — and I think we can do it.


You can learn more about the Pirate Party by visiting them online at www.pirateparty.ca.

This is the sixth in a series of profiles we will be posting over the course of the campaign.  Here are the others we have published so far:

Canadian Action Party, leader Christopher Porter here.
United Party of Canada, leader Brian Jedan, here.
Marijuana Party of Canada, leader Blair T. Longley here. 
Rhinoceros Party of Canada, leader Francois "Yo" Gound here.
Libertarian Party of Canada, VP of Political Action John Shaw here. 
Animal Alliance Environment Voters Party of Canada, leader Liz White here.
Christian Heritage Party of Canada, Executive Director Vicki Gunn here. 

Communist Party of Canada, campaign coordinator Dave Andrews here. 
Communist Party of Canada (Marxist-Leninist) leader Anna DiCarlo here.



Read more ...

Fringe Party Profiles: The Marijuana Party of Canada

The Marijuana Party of Canada does not want your vote. Their current leader, Blair T. Longley, is very clear about that. He has a long history of active membership in fringe parties, including the Greens, Rhinos and Quebec's Bloc pot, but this time around, he believes that a vote for his party, or any of the other fringe parties, is tantamount to throwing your vote away. His campaign, after all, is essentially devoted to one issue — the legalization of marijuana — and the biggest threat to that cause is Stephen Harper. So instead of asking you to vote for him, Longley is asking you to vote strategically to ensure the Conservatives don't win a majority.

Still, in the last federal election, the Marijuana Party ran eight candidates, who combined to receive 2,298 votes. That was 0.02% of the ballots cast. They finished 12th of the 19 parties who ran, right after the Canadian Action Party and before the Rhinoceros Party.

We recently asked Longley a few questions about his party and his thoughts on the current campaign. Here's what he had to say:


How would you describe your party to a voter who isn't already familiar with it?

The Marijuana Party began as a single issue party raising the view that cannabis should not be criminal. The good old glory days of the Marijuana Party were between 2000 and 2003. In 2004, the elections laws were changed in ways that effectively wiped us out. After that big parties make money from elections, while small parties go broke.

We fought, but finally lost in 2008, a court case against the unfairness that votes for big parties are worth $2 per year each to those parties, while votes for smaller parties are worth nothing. After we lost that court case, there is no longer any practical reason to run more than one Candidate, and no practical reason to ask voters to vote for our Candidates.

The interest of the Canadian cannabis community is to defeat Conservative Party Candidates.

We recommend that voters look at the past results in their own riding, which can be learned by using the Voter Information Service search engines provided by Elections Canada's website. Clicking on the last tab of information on any particular electoral district provides the results from the past few elections. Voters could judge which alternative party is most likely to be able to defeat the Conservative in their particular riding. In most cases that means voting for the Liberal Party, or the Bloc Québecois within the province of Québec, while, in some cases, the best strategic vote to defeat the Conservatives is to vote for the New Democratic Party. We want people to use their vote strategically, to try to defeat the Conservatives, by voting for whomever could defeat them, in any given particular electoral district.

Of course, strategic voting usually sucks, but the alternative is far worse. Therefore, we do not want people to vote for the Marijuana Party. (We are only running Candidates in a few ridings, and so the vast majority of Canadians will not have a Marijuana Party Candidate on their ballots anyway.)

The Marijuana Party was built on the idea that cannabis should not be criminal. However, the Conservative Party wants to criminalize cannabis even MORE!!!

Since 2005, the Harper Government has been attempting to enact mandatory minimum jail sentences for cannabis "crimes" that only exist because of the huge lies about "reefer madness" that demonized marijuana. Their previous Bills C-26, C-15 and S-10 would have imposed those kinds of penalties. Those three Bills all came very close to becoming law, before elections or prorogation saved us at the last moment. Criminologists estimate that those kinds of mandatory jail sentences for cannabis "crimes" would result in about 3,000 more Canadians per year being in jail, which would cost the taxpayers billions of dollars per year. The only way to stop that from eventually happening is to defeat the Conservatives, or, at least, to stop the Conservatives from winning a majority!

What kind of voter do you expect your party to appeal to?

People who can not stand the stink of strategic voting, and so, would rather park their protest vote with us.

What policies, if any, does your party support beyond the legalization of marijuana?

None. The ONLY real things that we can offer are ways to make an after-tax profit from protesting, through the Participation Premiums offered via our autonomous electoral district associations. See our website articles for the details: here and here.

What's your party's attitude toward other drugs?

All drugs are tools, and people should be able to enjoy informed consent regarding their individual use of those drugs.

There is a simple difference between drugs that can be seen by asking this question: "What does an overdose do?" Drugs that are fatal in overdose are obviously more dangerous that drugs that have no fatal overdose. In general, only the psychedelic or hallucinogenic drugs are NOT fatal in overdose. Natural plants, such as magic mushrooms, are preferred as the usually better ones. Stronger drugs, such as mescaline and LSD are by far the most interesting of drugs.

What do you see as the least important issue currently distracting attention away from more vital ones?

Canada is controlled by huge lies!!! Our monetary and taxation system is almost inconceivably crazy and corrupt. For good videos to watch regarding more details about the money system topic, see: here.

Another example is that everything Canada did in Afghanistan was based on our being tricked by the false flag attacks on 9/11/2001.

The list of those huge lies is very long, since societies tend to be controlled by the people who are the best at being dishonest, and backing that up with violence. Therefore, we are living in a Bizarro Mirror World Fun House, where almost everything is backwards.

It is because pot is the single best plant on the planet for people, for food, fiber, fun and medicine, that the law lies that "marijuana is almost as bad as murder," and enforcing pot prohibition is the single biggest thing that the police do. These kinds of huge lies are different at every level ... but nevertheless, they are ubiquitous, and control practically everything that governments really do.

What has to have happened by the time the election is over for you to look back on it as a success?

If the Conservatives are prevented from winning a majority, that will be a success!

What are your long-term hopes for your party? Where would you like to see it in five or ten years?


I doubt that we will survive for that long.


You can visit the Marijuana Party of Canada online at www.marijuanaparty.ca.

This is the third in a series of profiles we will be posting over the course of the campaign.  Here are the others we have published so far:

Canadian Action Party, leader Christopher Porter here.
United Party of Canada, leader Brian Jedan, here.
Rhinoceros Party of Canada, leader Francois "Yo" Gound here.
Libertarian Party of Canada, VP of Political Action John Shaw here. 
Pirate Party of Canada, former leader Jake Daynes here. 
Animal Alliance Environment Voters Party of Canada, leader Liz White here.
Christian Heritage Party of Canada, Executive Director Vicki Gunn here. 

Communist Party of Canada, campaign coordinator Dave Andrews here. 
Communist Party of Canada (Marxist-Leninist) leader Anna DiCarlo here.



Read more ...

Fringe Party Profiles: The Communist Party (Marxist-Leninist)

Canada has two Communist parties. The youngest is the Communist Party of Canada (Marxist-Leninist), who appear on the ballots as the Marxist-Leninist Party in order to avoid confusion. They were founded in 1970. That was at a time when Communist movements all over the world were being fractured, various factions throwing their support behind particular dictators and ideological strains. The CPC-ML were "anti-revisionist", which meant they sided with China against the Soviet Union, who were accused of softening their approach after Stalin's death. Eventually, however, they split with China too, more closely aligning with Stalin-loving Albanian dictator Enver Hoxha.

These days, they've set off more in their own direction. They argue in favour increasing spending for social programs, while nationalizing all banks and other financial institutions. They would seek a new constitution for Canada, with strengthened rights for minorities and Quebec. Internationally, they would withdraw from NAFTA, NATO, NORAD and all international military and financial blocks. They would call for the end to blockades against Cuba and North Korea. And they would seek to reform the United Nations so that every country has an equal say.

In our last federal election, the Marxist-Leninists were the second most popular fringe party, finishing 7th of the 19 parties who ran. That was right behind the Christian Heritage Party and just ahead of the Libertarians. They put forward 59 candidates, more than any other fringe party, and won about 8,500 votes. That was 0.06% of the ballots cast.

We spoke with the party's leader, Anna DiCarlo, earlier in the campaign to ask about her views and her thoughts on the current campaign. (Two of our questions went unanswered; we've included them below.)

How would you describe your party to a voter who isn't already familiar with it?

Our party's main aim is to organize Canadians to empower themselves. We don't agree with party governments where political parties have formed a mafia-style cartel which wheels and deals behind the backs of the people. Another hallmark of our party is that it is very informed about the issues that concern Canadians. We even publish a daily newspaper in both official languages which goes to literally thousands of people. Visit our website at mlpc.ca and see for yourselves.

What kind of voter do you expect your party to appeal to?

Our party appeals to those who dare to take a stand against the establishment set-up whereby they are marginalized and don't count. Today our vote is negligible but it represents a whole new way of doing things and has a future.

What do you think is the most important issue facing voters in this election?

The striving of Canadians for empowerment. Who will decide the outcome of the election? Money and fraudulent politics. Who decides the direction of the economy? The monopolies and governments in their service. As in the past, they will announce a fraudulent majority and claim a mandate to rule. But Canadians are taking a stand against this bogus decision-making process. They are already abstaining in large numbers but recognize this does not create an alternative. Various means are being developed to give expression to the demands of the working people.

Another crucial issue is Canada's involvement in yet another military aggression, with all the parties in the House of Commons voting to intervene in Libya's civil war. We need an anti-war government to turn Canada into a factor for peace.

What do you see as the least important issue currently distracting attention away from more vital ones?

To divert from the people’s striving for empowerment, the ruling circles are trying to make this election a two-way race. They hope to re-establish the parliamentary equilibrium based on a Party-in-Power and a Party-in-Opposition so as to get out of the nightmare of a dysfunctional parliament. Instead of formulating their own political demands, Canadians are supposed to choose between two parties representing variants of a right-wing fringe extremist program, both of which are desperately trying to convince us that they are mainstream. This is not an option for most Canadians. Even Canadians who are clear about the necessity to defeat Harper, whose concentration of power in the PMO and in his own persona has reached tyrannical proportions, have difficulty believing that the Liberals are more benign.

What do you see as the biggest flaw in the way the country has been run over the last few years?

The civil society which is supposed to be based on the recognition of public right is adopting all the arrangements that characterize a tyranny. Arrangements established in the past to sort out differences amongst individuals, and between individuals and collectives, are defunct. Governments uphold monopoly right in the name of economic prosperity, job creation, globalization and security. They are trampling underfoot the very notion that people are born to society and depend on it for their living. They are not fit to govern. This is not because folks like us don't like them but because they have lost all moral legitimacy.

What, in your opinion, are the important differences between your party and the Communist Party of Canada?

Why speak about differences? The MLPC moved some of its candidates so we wouldn’t have both an MLPC and a CPC candidate in the same riding. This includes the riding where the CPC’s national leader is running. We would like to extend this to all ridings. The CPC says it agrees. Difficulties include not having advance knowledge of where candidates are being fielded, but we think this can be overcome.

Much of your platform is based on "democratic renewal" and a new constitution. How would your party change the electoral process of Canadians?

Our slogans No Election Without Selection and Fund the Process Not the Parties address the main problem that the electoral process is dominated by political parties with a combined membership of less than 1% of the electors. Canadians don't select their own candidates. Unless someone is your peer, how do you hold them to account? Even an independent candidate, unless independently wealthy, rarely makes headway. Most importantly the individual MPs themselves exercise no control over their party’s politics. In Question Period the questions are not even their own, but given to them by the Party Whip. Of course, the questions are not for the purpose of deliberating on policies, but solely to discredit their opponents.

Our program for democratic renewal also calls for a new constitution which would recognize rights by virtue of being human and provide them with a guarantee, recognize the hereditary rights of the First Nations, and the right of Quebec to self-determination. Whatever the new arrangement is, it should be drafted by a Constituent Assembly duly elected by the people and submitted to a referendum.

We ourselves would favour a renewed Canada based on a free and equal union of its constituent parts for purposes of opposing annexation. Canada was founded on the basis of opposing the annexation of British North America to the U.S. Today, annexation has becomes the rule, not only in economic terms but militarily as well, and who knows what other government ministries have become part of the U.S. fifth column. Once the raison d’etre of opposing annexation is ended, what is Canada? It is a serious question. To answer it, we need all Canadians to participate in a new nation building project which vests sovereignty in the people. Right now sovereignty is vested in the Queen of England, an anachronistic institution. We are categorically opposed to the Royal Prerogative and the anachronistic institutions based on such a decision-making mechanism.

On our website we have several briefs to Parliament which detail how we think the electoral process can be reformed. As well, there are three very informative and analytical books on Canada’s political process and the need for democratic renewal written by Hardial Bains during and after the 1992 Charlottetown Accord referendum: The Essence of the Consensus Report, A Future to Face, and A Power to Share.

Your platform also promises to nationalize banks and other financial institutions. Are there other programs and organizations your party would nationalize as well?

At this time, the main form this struggle takes is to demand that governments uphold public right, not monopoly right. Canadians are waging a huge fight against the privatization of health care, education, postal services, the plunder of natural resources, such as the export of raw logs, and against the destruction of manufacturing, ie: against nation wrecking.

What is your response to people who suggest that voting for a lesser-known political party is tantamount to throwing your vote away?

We think that casting a ballot for one of the well-known parties is a wasted vote. The days are long gone when the so-called major parties could claim to represent the national interest. The notion that Canadians who are not represented by the party in power are represented by the opposition is also total nonsense. The fact that the largest party in Canada is the abstentionist party shows that Canadians consider a vote for one of the so-called major parties, the ones presented as “viable” options, to be a waste because the rule of the monopoly interests is a foregone conclusion.

Only the working class does not represent a special interest because it is the producer of all the wealth the society depends upon for its living and functioning. It should set the direction for the economy and exercise control over the decision-making process, including who is selected and elected to govern. It should sort out the problem of political representation which is a non-partisan issue and faces the country as a whole. We call on the working class to constitute itself the nation and vest sovereignty in the people

What is the biggest challenge you expect your party to face over the course of the campaign?

We compete on our own terms to systematically raise the level of organization of the Canadian workers - to bring it on par with their political needs. This means that during the election we continue to participate in the anti-war movement; the movement to defend public services, such as against the privatization of the post office and the efforts of the municipal and provincial governments to attack the public sector workers in Toronto and privatize ‘everything that isn’t nailed down;’ the actions for May Day, where for the first time during a federal election, workers will be on Parliament Hill presenting their demands in defence of their rights and so on.

We also continue to publish our daily on-line newspaper, TML Daily, and a monthly magazine, The Workers Forum, in both official languages. We have one of the most informative web-sites with news, analysis and commentaries on major international and national affairs, lots of photos and reports on people fighting for their demands, and election coverage as well.

What has to have happened by the time the election is over for you to look back on it as a success?

The strengthening of the ability of the people to put forward their own solutions to problems they and the society face.

What are your long-term hopes for your party? Where would you like to see it in five or ten years?

We are dedicated to the cause of democratic renewal and think it is a problem that can only be solved when people of all political persuasions who want to put an end to the status quo unite with this single aim in mind.

What's your party's attitude toward Communist governments in other parts of the world, particularly in Cuba, China and North Korea?

How much has your party's ideology changed since its founding? Does it still share much in common with the ideas of former Albanian leader Enver Hoxha, and his anti-revisionist defence of Stalinism?


You can learn more about the Communist Party of Canada (Marxist-Leninist) by visiting them at cpcml.ca

This is the ninth in a series of profiles we will be posting over the course of the campaign.  Here are the others we have published so far:

Canadian Action Party, leader Christopher Porter here.
United Party of Canada, leader Brian Jedan, here.
Marijuana Party of Canada, leader Blair T. Longley here. 
Rhinoceros Party of Canada, leader Francois "Yo" Gound here.
Libertarian Party of Canada, VP of Political Action John Shaw here. 
Pirate Party of Canada, former leader Jake Daynes here. 
Animal Alliance Environment Voters Party of Canada, leader Liz White here.
Christian Heritage Party of Canada, Executive Director Vicki Gunn here.
Communist Party of Canada, campaign coordinator Dave Andrews here.




Read more ...

Fringe Party Profiles: The Libertarian Party of Canada

With all the commotion over our recent post criticizing the libertarian-minded Republican candidate Ron Paul, this seemed like a good time to revisit our interview with one of the organizers of the Libertarian Party of Canada. It was originally posted on April 5, 2011, as part of a series of interviews with fringe party candidates during the last Canadian federal election campaign:  

The Libertarian Party of Canada is full of, well, libertarians. So they're not exactly big on big government. Freedom is the priority; government should be strictly limited to ensuring that people's freedoms and rights are protected. The policies on their website lay out a plan to strip it all down to nothing but the bare essentials.

They "support the repeal of all taxation" and with it, almost all government programs and services. They would cancel funding for child services, educational institutions, welfare and other relief programs. They would privatize health care, legalize all drugs, end the requirement for prescriptions, and do away with all forced psychiatric confinement. They would sell off the CBC, the NFB and all National Parks. They would end minimum wage and the 40-hour work week, while repealing the Canadian Pension Program. All government intervention in interest rates—and the economy in general—would be done away with, including the Bank of Canada. They would end gun control, repeal the War Measures Act and  prohibit military conscription. They would open up immigration, while canceling all foreign aid. They would support free trade with the rest of the world, while withdrawing from the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.

The government would, however, pass laws to the protect the environment. Consumers would also be protected from fraud and misrepresentation (though all consumer protection laws and safety standards would be repealed). The military would still receive enough funding to ensure the defense of the country, with a policy of non-intervention internationally. Absolute free speech would be protected, except for cases of threat and fraud.

The current leader of the Libertarian Party—which has been around since the '70s—is Dennis Young, a Calgarian and former soldier. In the last election, he led his party to an 8th place finish (of the 19 parties who ran), right behind the Marxist-Leninists and ahead of the Progressive Canadian Party. The ran 26 candidates and received 7,300 votes. That's 0.05% of the ballots cast.

We recently spoke with John Shaw, their V.P. of Political Action, to get his thoughts on the party and the current campaign.


How would you describe your party to a voter who isn't already familiar with it?

The party of choice. We believe most people most of the time make the best choices on how to live their lives. Government is for controlling the 1% of the people making bad choices, that affect others, if not restricted or some control put on them after causing problems (theft, violence, etc.). Unfortunately just about all governments want to regulate and control virtually everything everyone does, and so they take away the choice of the individual who is not harming others. As a result some person who has never met you and who may not care much about you ends up making far too many choices for you.

To change this we advocate a strong constitution that limits government to only the roles that only they can do. This is a fraction of what they do now, but if you look at the freedom and economic success of countries it is in almost direct proportion to the extent they have already embrace this idea since the concept was created in the 17th century.

What do you think is the most important issue facing voters in this election?

Out of control government spending.

What kind of voter do you expect your party to appeal to?

People who are comfortable they are responsible citizens and that most of the time their neighbour is too. People who do not feel the need to dominate their neighbours through the proxy of government.

What kind of role does your party believe the government should play in the delivery of health care, the protection of the environment, and the regulation of the economy?

Health care and economic regulation:

Government should be regulating against fraud, and providing an independent and impartial system to remedy the situation where fraud or violence happens. They should not be providing ‘services’, especially in a monopoly fashion as they in health care now. They should not be involved in removing choices like the CRTC or determining who owns a private company simply to buy votes.

Pollution:

Pollution is separate and is a complex problem in that all activity creates some amount of it so the goal cannot be zero even in theory, as theoretically the level and be with fraud or violence. Pollution needs to be regulated so that excessive harm does not come to people, and offenders need to be treated as with any other criminal who was harming people through negligence. The penalty must fit the crime too. In the past so often government would give exemption from prosecution simply for political reasons, so great harm could be done without remedy by the people harmed. What excessive harm is needs to be scientifically determined on a case by case basis, and not be the whim of politicians of people with alternative agendas as it is so often now.

What do you see as the least important issue currently distracting attention away from more vital ones?

The cult like status most parties seem to be trying to create around their leaders, while demonizing the opposition leaders. Policy matters, not perception, and there is little difference in the policies of the main 4 parties.

What do you see as the biggest flaw in the way the country has been run over the last few years?

To much spending during the Harper Government years, “the last few years” and a significant loss of freedom on social issues with the new social engineering programs (mandatory sentencing and the like).

What's your response to people who suggest that voting for a lesser-known political party is tantamount to throwing your vote away?

I ask them to explain why their think the other party they are going to vote for is going to be any different than the other parties. With some smaller parties there can be real a difference and that is their choice, but if they think the policy of say the Liberals vs. the Conservatives is enough different to be enough of a net difference to be bothered going down to vote then I just say thanks and move on since they will never understand us.

What is the biggest challenge you expect your party to face over the course of the campaign?

We are an all volunteer party, not being given millions of dollars from the government. So people finding time to get the message out is always a challenge no matter how motivated.

What has to have happened by the time the election is over for you to look back on it as a success?

I want to hear the word libertarian *used correctly* in the media 10 times. That is a huge first step as it is a great idea that has a tendency to sell itself once people have heard it.

What are your long-term hopes for your party? Where would you like to see it in five or ten years?

I would like to see our ideas stolen by the major parties, and for them to be scrambling against us to be the most libertarian party (as opposed to now where they are scrambling to be the most authoritarian with endless piles of new programs).


You can learn more about the Libertarian Party by visiting them online at www.libertarian.ca.

This is the fifth in a series of profiles we will be posting over the course of the campaign.  Here are the others we have published so far:

Canadian Action Party, leader Christopher Porter here.
United Party of Canada, leader Brian Jedan, here.
Marijuana Party of Canada, leader Blair T. Longley here. 
Rhinoceros Party of Canada, leader Francois "Yo" Gound here.
Pirate Party of Canada, former leader Jake Daynes here. 
Animal Alliance Environment Voters Party of Canada, leader Liz White here.
Christian Heritage Party of Canada, Executive Director Vicki Gunn here. 

Communist Party of Canada, campaign coordinator Dave Andrews here. 
Communist Party of Canada (Marxist-Leninist) leader Anna DiCarlo here.



Read more ...

Fringe Party Profiles: The Rhinoceros Party of Canada

The very first leader of the Rhino Party of Canada was Cornelius The First, a black rhinoceros at the Granby Zoo in Québec. He was an appropriate choice, according  to the party, because all politicians are "thick-skinned, slow-moving, dim-witted, can move fast as hell when in danger, and have large, hairy horns growing out of the middle of their faces."

In the years since the satirical party was launched in 1963, they have put forth an impressively diverse list of campaign promises—the overriding promise being that they promise not keep any of their promises. They've suggested, among many other things, repealing the law of gravity, making the Trans-Canada Highway a one-way road, turning Manitoba into the world's largest parking lot, re-counting the Thousand Islands to make sure the United States hasn't stolen any of them since we last checked, abolishing the environment because it's too hard to take care of, putting the national debt on VISA, and declaring war on Belgium because Tintin killed a rhino once—an international crisis that was only narrowly averted when the Belgian government agreed to send beer and mussels to the Rhino Party head offices.

The party's popularity peaked in 1984, when Cornelius got about 100,000 votes—a full percent of the ballots cast. Yes, you are reading that correctly: in the 1984 federal election one out of every hundred Canadians who voted, voted for a rhinoceros. But then in 1993, the laws were changed so that every party had to run candidates in at least 50 ridings, with a thousand dollar fee for each one. The Rhino Party was forced to fold.

It was only a few years ago, when the laws were changed again, that the party was resurrected. The leader of the second Rhino Party is François "Yo" Gourd. He was a candidate back in the party's early days and has since become one of the masterminds behind the entartistes, the group who have thrown pies in the faces of politicians like Jean Chretien, Ralph Klein, Jean Charest, Stephane Dion and Allan Rock.

In 2008, Gourd's Rhino Party ran seven candidates and won 2,122 votes. That was 0.02% of the ballots cast. They finished 13th of the 19 parties who ran, just behind the Marijuana Party and ahead of the Newfoundland and Labrador First Party.

We recently sent Gourd a series of questions about his party and his thoughts on the current campaign. Here's what he sent back:

We plan to run around 20 candidates.
We represent the 40% of the people who do not vote. We say that it is important to vote. We want to abolish the military budget. We want to abolish the fiscal evasion paradise. We want to abolish the Canadian goverment who has divided us for too long. We want to be like Europe. We say: Vive la Colombie libre. Vive l'Alberta libre! Vive l'Ontario libre! Vive le Québec Libre!
We will unite Québec to Cuba and create a new country called CUBEC.
Every candidate before he speaks at the parliament will have to say a joke before he talks.
Apathy is the worst thing that can hapen to the Canadian people.
The voters that have lost their faith in all the other parties are among our voters. If the clowns can organise and create an official party then everybody can, even petrocan...
Economy for the rich and the payment for all the others. We are being robbed by the big companies in complicity by the conservatives and liberals. Vote NDP, Vote Bloc. Vote Marijuana. Vote Communist. Vote Rhino, but vote....
The Rhino party have been there since 1963 and we have changed the face of Canadian democracy.
We want the return of smiling faces on Canadian passports.
We want to put aside the priests, the bishops, the rabbis. Get out he who says that he will talk to god for you and ask for a donation in return. God has no religion said Gandhi. God is in everybody, god is everybody.
Free marijuana for those who want to smoke freely.
Use hemp for making paper, oil, etc.
Take the rocky mountains and bring them to fill up the tar sand holes in Alberta.
Kick the Toronto mayor out...
Bring beds in the senate so they can sleep
Put Harper on a diet so he looses his belly.
We are Harper's bizarres...
We want the world and we want it now.....
We want to sing and laugh our way to Ottawa.
We promise you the moon!

You can learn more about the Rhinoceros Party by visiting them online at www.neorhino.ca.

This is the fourth in a series of profiles we will be posting over the course of the campaign.  Here are the others we have published so far:

Canadian Action Party, leader Christopher Porter here.
United Party of Canada, leader Brian Jedan, here.
Marijuana Party of Canada, leader Blair T. Longley here. 
Libertarian Party of Canada, VP of Political Action John Shaw here. 
Pirate Party of Canada, former leader Jake Daynes here. 
Animal Alliance Environment Voters Party of Canada, leader Liz White here.
Christian Heritage Party of Canada, Executive Director Vicki Gunn here. 

Communist Party of Canada, campaign coordinator Dave Andrews here. 
Communist Party of Canada (Marxist-Leninist) leader Anna DiCarlo here.



Read more ...

Fringe Party Profiles: The Animal Alliance Environment Voters Party

The Animal Alliance Environment Voters Party of Canada  has the longest name of any federal party for good reason: it was born out of a collaboration between two other organizations. The first was the Animal Alliance. They were founded in 1990 to fight for animals rights and environmental protection. Over the years, they've tackled everything from banning the import of puppy mill dogs from the States to ending the trade in bear parts. In 1999, they formed the Environment Voters group as a way to get more directly involved during election campaigns. But a few years later, when a new law was passed which restricted the role "third parties" like the Environment Voters could play in campaigns, the two groups decided to come together as an official federal party.

Still, they are more about supporting causes than winning votes. In their first election in 2006, they purposefully fielded the minimum of one candidate and openly threw their support behind the NDP. In 2008, the last time we went to the polls, they ran four and won 527 votes. That's less than 0.01% of the ballots cast. They finished 16th of the 19 parties who ran, ahead of the Work Less Party, the Western Block Party and the People's Political Power Party.

This time around, they have seven candidates. Their website highlights some of their current concerns:  the seal hunt, coyote-killing contests near Ottawa, a proposed elk hunt near Algonquin Park, various wildlife culls around the country, factory farming practices, and animal transportation regulations. (They point out that currently cows can be transported without food, water or rest for 57 straight hours, pigs for 36.)


We recently spoke with leader Liz White, who is a candidate in Thornhill, to get her thoughts on the party and the current campaign.


How would you describe your party to a voter who isn't already familiar with it?

The mandate of our party is to protect all animals and the environment we share through electoral politics, legislative advocacy and education.

What do you think is the most important issue facing voters in this election?

The most important issue facing voters is the environment and related issues such as global warming, and the increase in the number of species at risk. Our very lives depend on a clean, healthy robust environment. The environment is about the cleanliness of the air we breath and the water we drink. Disregard for environmental consequences will impact every aspect of our lives.

What kind of voter do you expect your party to appeal to?

Our candidates know that they are likely not to receive very many votes. The purpose of running is to raise issues that none of the other parties are raising. We are also appealing to voters who want to see real change both in electoral policies and environmental and animal protection policies.

What do you see as the biggest flaw in the way the country has been run over the last few years?

The biggest flaw is the electoral process. We need some form of proportional representation so that issues that are not reflected by the major parties find some democratic expression through elected representation.

In the 2006 campaign, your party openly endorsed NDP candidates. Are you asking for voters to choose the Animal Alliance over any other party in this election? And if so, what's your response to people who suggest that voting for a lesser-known political party is tantamount to throwing your vote away?

We are recommending anyone but Harper so depending on the particular riding will depend on the message we send to our supporters.

What is the biggest challenge you expect your party to face over the course of the campaign?

The biggest challenge is having sufficient resources to run a significant campaign in at least one riding. However, it takes time to learn how to campaign and our people are just leaning how to be candidates.

What has have happened by the time the election is over for you to look back on it as a success?

Success will be measured by candidates from other parties who we have convinced to change their mind on issues like the seal hunt, horse slaughter, farm animal transport and a new hands off approach to the management of our national parks and protected areas.

What are your long-term hopes for your party? Where would you like to see it in five or ten years?

Activists in the Netherlands have demonstrated that in a system of proportional representation, animal activists can get elected as has happened with The Party for the Animals. In Israel, animal protection folks are elected at the municipal level. Our party will be well situated to win a seat or two at the federal level should proportional representation ever become a reality in Canada.

You can learn more about the Animal Alliance Environment Voters Party by visiting them online at www.environmentvoters.org.

This is the seventh in a series of profiles we will be posting over the course of the campaign.  Here are the others we have published so far:

Canadian Action Party, leader Christopher Porter here.
United Party of Canada, leader Brian Jedan, here.
Marijuana Party of Canada, leader Blair T. Longley here. 
Rhinoceros Party of Canada, leader Francois "Yo" Gound here.
Libertarian Party of Canada, VP of Political Action John Shaw here. 
Pirate Party of Canada, former leader Jake Daynes here. 
Christian Heritage Party of Canada, Executive Director Vicki Gunn here. 

Communist Party of Canada, campaign coordinator Dave Andrews here. 
Communist Party of Canada (Marxist-Leninist) leader Anna DiCarlo here.




Read more ...

Fringe Party Profiles: The Christian Heritage Party

The Christian Heritage Party is the most openly conservative party in Canada. Even Stephen Harper's policies seem kind of left-leaning by comparison. They would like to make abortion illegal and end same-sex marriage. They dismiss global warming as "alarmist propaganda". They claim Canada's health care system is one of the worst in the world and should be opened up to private competition. They want to bring back capital punishment and take the right to vote away from prisoners. They want to abolish income tax. They'd end government subsidies for the Canadian Pension Plan. They would loosen gun control restrictions. They believe the way arts are currently funded "promotes the lowest common denominator of decency" while rejecting projects "that promote good morals and family values." They believe the National Film Board "should be reduced to an archival facility". And they recently sent out a press release calling for a moratorium on all immigration from Muslim nations because "immigration is being used as a form of jihad designed to undermine Canada’s Judeo-Christian culture and law to replace it with Sharia law".

They are not, however, completely against government spending. They'd raise sales taxes to help offset the lost revenue from the abolished income tax and use it to fund their programs. They'd give $1000 a month to families with one parent staying home to raise their children. They'd make student loans interest free for the first ten years after graduation. They would invest more money in health care, fund improvements to hospitals and pay the tuition of medical students willing to work in rural areas.

The Christian Heritage Party is also the most popular fringe party in all of Canada. In the last election, their 59 candidates won them more votes than another party outside the big five: nearly 27,000 of them, good for 0.19% percent of all ballots cast across the country. (The Greens, who some people like to call fringe, got  nearly a million. Even the Christian Heritage Party would have to grow by about 3500% to rival them.)

The party's current leader is Jim Hnatiuk, a Baptist deacon and former soldier who runs what Wikipedia calls "the largest hunting, fishing and taxidermy business in Nova Scotia." We recently spoke with Vicki Gunn, a candidate and the Executive Director of the party, to get her thoughts on the current campaign.

How would you describe your party to a voter who isn't already familiar with it?

CHP Canada is Canada's only pro-life, pro-family federal political party. We have looked at moral issues, which recent governments have neglected to considering policies, i.e. Debt is theft from future generations - they will be the ones forced to repay it. Abortion kills a child.

What kind of voter do you expect your party to appeal to?

Our appeal is to traditional conservative voters.

What do you think is the most important issue facing voters in this election?

The economy is vitally important. According to StatsCan, by 2031 there will be 2 workers for every retiree. This, coupled with our debt, has left a difficult future for our children and grandchildren. How will they sustain the debt, retirement benefits under a "Pay as you Go" system, the government of the day, plus support themselves and their families. We must address the issue today!

What do you see as the least important issue currently distracting attention away from more vital ones?

The imposition of carbon taxes or cap and trade schemes for a false problem like climate change. The climate has always changed, 10,000 years ago this part of North America was under ice. We do not need increased taxation, which can only increase the debt we impose on future generations and increase the financial challenges faced by Canadians today.

What do you see as the biggest flaw in the way the country has been run over the last few years?

Government has abdicated its responsibility to govern. From the 1989 refusal to initiate laws to protect the unborn, granting abortion rights up to the moment the child fully exits its mothers body, to government's refusal to deal with Section 13 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, with its infringement on Canadian's rights. From government's refusal to protect the institution of marriage, which has historically provided a safe and secure environment for raising children, to government's refusal to protect our culture of freedoms and equalities from infringement by other world views. Government has failed to govern.

What's your response those who might be concerned about an openly religious government in Canada, given the country's religious diversity and the democratic tradition of a division between church and state?

Canada was founded under the Christian worldview from the naming of the Dominion of Canada (Psalm 72:8) under the inspiration of Sir Leonard Tilley to the Scripture verses written on our Parliament buildings. The worldview that gave us these freedoms and equalities that we enjoy have been deduced from Scripture. There is no other heritage that has produced the freedoms that we've enjoyed in the western world. Look to any other worldview to see the legacy they've left of bloody atrocities against their own people.

Your party's website has called for a moratorium on immigration from Muslim nations because "immigration is being used as a form of jihad designed to undermine Canada’s Judeo-Christian culture and law to replace it with Sharia law". Is that a fair representation? Does the Christian Heritage Party believe Canada is in real, imminent danger of falling under Sharia law?

In Ontario, a few years ago, Premier Dalton McGuinty faced the decision about whether to allow Sharia Law to be practiced. Thankfully, he chose to protect the freedoms and equalities of our heritage. We may not be so fortunate the next time it comes up. England now runs a parallel system of Sharia and British law. As women are not equal under Sharia Law then only some women in Britain are equal, the rest are subordinate. We see the challenges faced across Europe as women lose their protection as equal citizens and become forced to adhere to other worldviews. Whether it's the recognition that they must submit to dressing in certain ways if they enter certain neighbourhoods, or whether it's the fear of honour killings, the equality of women in the western world is no longer assured. Canada must protect our heritage and all current Canadians from facing this type of threat.

Some of the federal policies your party opposes -- for instance, funding for abortions and continued support for same-sex marriage -- have been interpreted by the courts as rights enshrined in the Canadian Charter of Rights. Would your party seek to amend the Charter, or find another way around legal challenges?

The courts have usurped government position by reading into the Charter what had been clearly expressed at its forming to not be there in the same sex marriage issue. That is not the job of judges, they have not been elected to govern. It is undemocratic to have our laws created by unelected people. The courts did not say abortion was a right in 1989, they said the current law was unconstitutional. They sent it back to Parliament to rewrite the law. Parliament abdicated its responsibility to govern.

Should the courts, government, or anyone determine that it is okay to kill handicapped people, that would not make the law just or moral. It is government's responsibility to protect ALL Canadians. Not just those who have exited healthily from their mother's womb and managed to remain without defect throughout their lives.

What's your response to people who suggest that voting for a lesser-known political party is tantamount to throwing your vote away?

Democracy is "Rule by the People". If the people vote for something they do not believe to be correct then they have wasted their vote. Voting to ensure the best government possible for the people of Canada is democracy... no matter how many ways it splits the vote.

What is the biggest challenge you expect your party to face over the course of the campaign?

Since the Liberal government brought in the voter subsidy to political parties gaining 5% of the voter support, they have deliberately made it as difficult as possible for the democratic process. It is undemocratic for government to block people from having the right to politically express themselves but they do it by commandeering that portion of tax payer money while refusing to allow people the right to choose what political party they will choose to support with the $2 government takes from them. Similarly, the government will pay a portion of campaign costs to the larger parties but again have placed qualification to protect their own interests.

What has to have happened by the time the election is over for you to look back on it as a success?

Our candidates will have presented to Canadians a platform that will protect our way of life, protect Canadians at all ages, protected the financial future of our children and grandchildren. The other political parties want to avoid moral issues but our candidates ensure that these issues remain in the public eye.

What are your long-term hopes for your party? Where would you like to see it in five or ten years?

I would like to see continued growth and seats achieved in Parliament. 


You can learn more about the Christian Heritage Party by visiting them online at www.chp.ca.

This is the eighth in a series of profiles we will be posting over the course of the campaign.  Here are the others we have published so far:

Canadian Action Party, leader Christopher Porter here.
United Party of Canada, leader Brian Jedan, here.
Marijuana Party of Canada, leader Blair T. Longley here. 
Rhinoceros Party of Canada, leader Francois "Yo" Gound here.
Libertarian Party of Canada, VP of Political Action John Shaw here. 
Pirate Party of Canada, former leader Jake Daynes here. 
Animal Alliance Environment Voters Party of Canada, leader Liz White here.
Communist Party of Canada, campaign coordinator Dave Andrews here. 
Communist Party of Canada (Marxist-Leninist) leader Anna DiCarlo here. 




Read more ...

Fringe Party Profiles: The United Party of Canada

The last time we had one of these federal election things — just two and a half years ago — the United Party of Canada didn't even exist yet. They didn't come together until late in 2009, founded by a group of people from across the political spectrum who were frustrated by the rigid ideologies of the major parties. For the most part, it seems, they believe in a strong federal government, with progressive social programs and environmental policies. They also emphasize fiscal responsibility, domestic manufacturing and expanding foreign trade — especially with our partners in the Commonwealth and the Francophonie. Poke around their website and you'll find that they'd also like to get rid of the penny, decriminalize marijuana,  and adopt a Guaranteed Minimum Annual Income.

A few months ago, they got their first electoral experience when the leader of the party, Brian Jedan, ran in the Vaughan by-election against Julian Fantino. Fantino won it for the Conservatives, while Jedan — whose previous passion was for construction work — got 55 votes. That was good for 0.1% of the ballots cast in the riding and 8th place of the 8 candidates who ran. In this election, he'll be running against Jack Layton in Toronto-Danforth.

We talked to Jedan last week to discuss his party's policies and gets his thoughts on the current campaign:

How would you describe your party to a voter who isn’t already familiar with it?

I would describe it as a pragmatic or practical party. We don’t believe in being tied to ideology in seeking solutions to national problems. Instead, we want to take into consideration the various factors that create problems and then look at all the possible solutions.

What kind of voter do you expect your party to appeal to?

We believe this party should appeal to a wide range of practical people who are not happy with the current choices.

What do you think is the most important issue facing voters in this election?

Democracy and whether we want a real democracy or a pseudo democracy in which two party leaders vie for absolute power. Democracy is far more than simply voting or a game, as many partisans seem to think. It is participation in our political process on a regular basis either through parties or other organizations.

What do you see as the least important issue currently distracting attention away from more vital ones?

The least important issue is the focus on coalition. Politics is the art of conciliation, compromise, and working together to solve national problems. If a coalition is needed to make that happen then it is a viable option. Our system should never be solely about the absolute power of one party to do as it wishes.

What do you see as the biggest flaw in the way the country has been run over the last few years?

The main flaw is the way in which partisan advantage has replaced good accountable government.

What’s your response to people who suggest that voting for a lesser-known political party is tantamount to throwing your vote away?

This is the traditional argument of the established parties to convince people to accept the status quo. It has always been new parties that have brought new ideas and new ways of looking at government into the public domain. Granted, the established parties have enacted a whole range of funding laws that makes it increasingly difficult for new parties to achieve success. Social media may be one means of getting around the roadblocks the established parties have put in our way.

What has to have happened by the time the election is over for you to look back on it as a success?

Your interest in the party, and that of others who have contacted us, makes this election a success for us already. When you are just starting out, small advances mean a great deal.

What are your long-term hopes for your party? Where would you like to see it in five or ten years?

We hope that we can change the direction of party politics. We would like to return it to the “rank and file” or “grassroots” or whatever name you give the general membership. The established parties have centralized power in the leader and a small number of advisors. The role of the general membership is to give money and help out during elections. The rest of the time all they have to do is follow the leader. That does not create a dynamic political organization.

We want a party through which we can freely discuss, debate, disagree, compromise, and finally come to a decision on issues by consensus or democratic vote. Our policies have been put out there for discussion and debate. I hope that we could be a voice for Canadians and that we would have such a large and engaged membership that we could elect MPs to Parliament.


You can visit the United Party of Canada online at www.unitedpartyofcanada.com.

This is the second in a series of profiles we will be posting over the course of the campaign.  Here are the others we have published so far:

Canadian Action Party, leader Christopher Porter here.
Marijuana Party of Canada, leader Blair T. Longley here. 
Rhinoceros Party of Canada, leader Francois "Yo" Gound here.
Libertarian Party of Canada, VP of Political Action John Shaw here. 
Pirate Party of Canada, former leader Jake Daynes here. 
Animal Alliance Environment Voters Party of Canada, leader Liz White here.
Christian Heritage Party of Canada, Executive Director Vicki Gunn here. 

Communist Party of Canada, campaign coordinator Dave Andrews here. 
Communist Party of Canada (Marxist-Leninist) leader Anna DiCarlo here.



Read more ...

Fringe Party Profiles: The Communist Party

The Communist Party is the second oldest political party in Canada. Only the Liberals have been around longer. It all started back in 1921, at a secret meeting in a barn just outside Guelph, when members of a variety of other socialist organizations came together to form the Canadian wing of the Comintern, the international body in charge of bringing about the world-wide Marxist revolution and the overthrow of the bourgeoisie.

Here, though, the Communists have been a little less radical than those in most parts of the world. When the party really started growing in popularity, during the Great Depression, they were calling for things like a minimum wage, unemployment insurance and a shorter workday. All of those policies would soon be adopted. And yet that didn't stop the Conservative government from declaring the party illegal, raiding its offices, jailing eight of its members including leader Tim Buck, and then sort of maybe trying to murder Buck in his prison cell. (The Toronto Dreams Project has the full version of that crazy story, "Crushing Mr. Communism", here.)

The public outrage in the wake of the attack forced the Prime Minster, R.B. Bennett, to back down. Buck was released; for a while he was something of a Canadian folk hero. And once the Soviet Union came in on our side of the Second World War, the Communists were more popular than ever — though the party was still technically illegal and temporarily forced to re-name themselves Labour-Progressive. They peaked at more than 2% in the polls, at a time when even the capitalists at Eaton's were putting together window displays dedicated to the glory of Joseph Stalin. The Cold War kind of killed all that goodwill, though. Buck retired from the leadership in the 1960s with his party sitting at about 0.05%.

Today, that's still about where they are. In the last federal election, the Communists ran 24 candidates and received about 3500 votes. That was 0.03% of the ballots cast. It put them 10th of the 19 parties who ran, with the Progressive Canadian Party right ahead of them and the Canadian Action Party right behind them. They  are, however, victims of Communist vote splitting. They finished a few spots back of the Communist Party of Canada (Marxist-Leninst), a newer organization founded in the '70s.

We recently spoke with the Communist Party's Dave Andrews, campaign coordinator, to talk about their views and get this thoughts on the current campaign.


How would you describe your party to a voter who isn't already familiar with it?

The Communist Party of Canada is the second oldest political party in Canada – formed in 1921. We have a long and proud history in the forefront of working class and progressive struggles for peace, jobs, democracy, sovereignty, social programs and socialism. In 2003, the CPC won a historic victory for democracy in Canada, by successfully challenging draconian changes to the Elections Act that required parties to field 50 candidates in elections or face deregistration and seizure of assets.

What kind of voter do you expect your party to appeal to?

We appeal to working families, who have a political awareness of the fundamental problems with capitalism and the need for socialism.

What do you think is the most important issue facing voters in this election?

The key issue is to defeat the Harper Conservatives – to block the right-wing agenda and prevent another Harper government. Alongside that, it is critical that voters elect a strong progressive block in Parliament, who can work with progressive movements outside Parliament and achieve real progressive change that puts people's needs before corporate greed.

What do you see as the least important issue currently distracting attention away from more vital ones?

The argument over the validity and stability of a coalition government is a ridiculous distraction. We do not hear Harper or the media complaining about coalition governments in Britain, Europe or Israel, do we?

What do you see as the biggest flaw in the way the country has been run over the last few years?

Harper has had a minority government that has been allowed to govern as a majority. Related to that, while the country has experienced the most terrible economic crisis in memory, the solutions implemented by the government have been in the interests of corporations and at the expense of working people and their communities.

What, in your opinion, are the important differences between your party and the Communist Party of Canada (Marxist-Leninist)?

The CPC(ML) was formed in the 1970's, guided by a particular ideological trend, and is a separate party from the CPC. While our members may cooperate in the labour and social movements, we do not have formal relations or an alliance with the CPC(ML).

What's your party's attitude toward Communist governments in other parts of the world, particularly in Cuba, China and North Korea?

We have relations with the governments of all of these countries, although some are closer than others. In particular, we have a strong relation with the government of Cuba and a long history of solidarity with the Cuban revolution. While we may have differences of opinion with some policies that are adopted by socialist governments around the world, we recognize the right of the people in those countries to identify their own path for social and economic development. We are staunchly opposed to interference by imperialist countries in the affairs of any other country, including the socialist and socialist-oriented ones.

Your party has a long history in Canada, including, at times, being outlawed by the federal government and criticized for its close ties with Stalin. What's your attitude toward that history? What kind of relationship is there between today's party and the party of the mid-20th century?

We have learned much from the history of struggle for socialism in Canada and around the world. While today's Communist Party has drawn lessons from our own experience in the mid-20th century, we remain proud of our work and accomplishments. For a more complete description of our program and history, readers can visit our main web site at www.communist-party.ca and read our program.

Your platform promises major investments in public programs. What's your party's plan to fund these investments? What kind of impact will it have on taxes?

The two main vehicles for funding public programs are a 75% reduction in military spending (this would provide almost $16 billion per year) and progressive tax changes that place the burden on those most able to pay – corporations and the very wealthy. We would reduce, and even eliminate, taxes for lower income people.

What's your response to people who suggest that voting for a lesser-known political party is tantamount to throwing your vote away?

Interesting question – one that we are often asked. There are two important considerations here. First, in our electoral system, any vote that is not for the winning candidate could be considered “wasted” - even if the second place person loses by only one vote, the winner takes the entire prize. However, a better way of looking at this is to recognize that significant votes for “non-winning” candidates do, in fact, register with people. Consider, for example, the broadening awareness and discourse of environmental issues that accompanied increasing Green Party votes. In that same light, significant votes for Communist candidates will make a memorable statement to the winning candidate, to the public, and to the media about what issues and solutions a community has its eye on.

What is the biggest challenge you expect your party to face over the course of the campaign?

Media coverage. Small parties always struggle for this.

What has to have happened by the time the election is over for you to look back on it as a success?

If Stephen Harper is looking for work and the Communist Party has grown in both numbers and profile, we'll have a good basis for building a stronger struggle for progressive social change in Canada.

What are your long-term hopes for your party? Where would you like to see it in five or ten years?

In that period, it would be very positive if we were in a position to run candidates in all provinces. It would also be nice if everyone in the country understood that the most important election site was www.votecommunist.ca .


This is the eighth in a series of profiles we will be posting over the course of the campaign.  Here are the others we have published so far:

Canadian Action Party, leader Christopher Porter here.
United Party of Canada, leader Brian Jedan, here.
Marijuana Party of Canada, leader Blair T. Longley here. 
Rhinoceros Party of Canada, leader Francois "Yo" Gound here.
Libertarian Party of Canada, VP of Political Action John Shaw here. 
Pirate Party of Canada, former leader Jake Daynes here. 
Animal Alliance Environment Voters Party of Canada, leader Liz White here.
Christian Heritage Party of Canada Executive Director Vicki Gunn here. 
Communist Party of Canada (Marxist-Leninist) leader Anna DiCarlo here.




Read more ...